Thursday, June 27, 2013
I Still Disagree with the Supreme Court
Argument number 2 involves financial benefits and inheritance issues. Really, says I. The obvious truth is that signing on to a work or business contract that does not provide benefits to your lover is your own fault, not the government's. What's more, while you may petition a private business owner to change the terms of the contract, he is under no legal obligation to do so. As for inheritance laws and death taxes, the government is morally wrong to override the written and notarized wills of the dead in most cases.
Change the law. Get the Federal Government out of the marriage business. They should not have the right to pick winners and losers in the marriage debate.
I have a theory why marriage is being so hotly challenged, and it has nothing to do with love or financial incentives, but everything to do with communism.
From the 45 Goals of Communist Takeover of America
Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
It seems to me broadening the definition of marriage to include gay and lesbian relationships is well in line with these two goals.